publication . Article . 2016

Cost overruns and financial risk in the construction of nuclear power reactors: a critical appraisal

Alex Gilbert; Benjamin K. Sovacool; Philip Johnstone; Andrew Stirling;
Open Access English
  • Published: 01 Apr 2016
  • Publisher: Elsevier
<p>Lovering and colleagues attempt to advance understanding of construction cost escalation risks inherent in building nuclear reactors and power plants, a laudable goal. Although we appreciate their focus on capital cost increases and overruns, we maintain in this critical appraisal that their study conceptualizes cost issues in a limiting way. Methodological choices in treating different cost categories by the authors mean that their conclusions are more narrowly applicable than they describe. We also argue that their study is factually incorrect in its criticism of the previous peer-reviewed literature. Earlier work, for instance, has compared historical cons...
Persistent Identifiers
free text keywords: Atomic energy, Construction cost overrun, Nuclear energy, Nuclear power, Economics, Criticism, Critical appraisal, Actuarial science, Atomic energy, Nuclear power, business.industry, business, Capital cost, Financial risk, Energy source, Cost escalation
Related Organizations
Energy Research

Koomey, J., and Hultman, N.E. 2007. A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear policy 1970- 2005. Energy Policy 35, 5630-5642.

Leftly, M. (2015, August). Secrecy over new nuclear plant disgraceful. The Independent. London.

Retrieved from Lovering, J. 2015. October 19: Jessica Lovering to Speak at UC Berkeley on Real Costs of Nuclear Power Event Date: October 19 2015 3105 Etcheverry Hall, University of California, Berkeley. Available at

Lovering, J.R., Yip, A., and Nordhaus, T. 2016a. Historical construction costs of global nuclear power reactors. Energy Policy 91, 371-382.

Lovering, J. et al. 2016b. Historical Construction Costs of Global Nuclear Power Reactors. February 2, 2016, available at Marshall, J.M., Navarro, P., 1991. Costs of nuclear power plant construction: theory and new evidence.

The RAND Journal of Economics 22, 148-154 Massey, A. (1988). Technocrats and Nuclear Politics. Aldershot: Gower Publishing.

Nordhaus, T. 2016. Nuclear Costs Reconsidered. February 2. Available at Pearce, J. M. (2012). Limitations of nuclear power as a sustainable energy source. Sustainability, 4(6), 1173-1187. Roberts, David. Wind and solar are much less financially risky than other power projects. December, 2014. Grist, available at Shahan, Zachary. 2014. Least Financially Risky Electricity Projects: Solar & Wind. CleanTechia, December 20. Available at Shrader-Frechette, K. (2011). Climate Change, Nuclear Economics, and Conflicts of Interest. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(1), 75-107. Sovacool, BK and SV Valentine. The National Politics of Nuclear Power: Economics, Security, and Governance (London: Routledge Global Security Studies Series, 2012).

Sovacool, B.K., Nugent, D., Gilbert, A. 2014a. Construction costs overruns and electricity infrastructure: an unavoidable risk? The Electricity Journal 27 (4) 112-120.

Sovacool, B.K., Gilbert, A., Nugent, D. 2014b. Risk, innovation, electricity infrastructure and construction cost overruns: testing six hypotheses. Energy 74, 906-917.

Sovacool, B.K., Gilbert, A., Nugent, D. 2014c. An international comparative assessment of construction cost overruns for electricity infrastructure. Energy Research & Social Science 3, 152-160.

Sovacool, BK and MV Ramana. “Back to the Future: Small Modular Reactors, Nuclear Fantasies, and Symbolic Convergence,” Science, Technology, & Human Values 40(1) (January, 2015), pp. 96-125. [OpenAIRE]

Wiser, R., and Bolinger, M. 2014 Wind Technologies Market Report. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. September 2015. Available at: [OpenAIRE]

Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue