• Energy Research
• Preprint close

To evaluate the effects of different energy retrofit scenarios on the residential building sector, in this study, an urban building energy model (UBEM) was developed from open data, calibrated using energy performance certificates (EPCs), and validated against hourly electricity use measurement data. The calibrated and validated UBEM was used for implementing energy retrofit scenarios and improving the energy performance of the case study city of Varberg, Sweden. Additionally, possible consequences of the scenarios on the electricity grid were also evaluated in this study. The results showed that for a calibrated UBEM, the MAPE of the simulated versus delivered energy to the buildings was 26 %. Although the model was calibrated based on annual values from some of the buildings with EPCs, the validation ensured that it could produce reliable results for different spatial and temporal levels than calibrated for. Furthermore, the validation proved that the spatial aggregation over the city and temporal aggregation over the year could considerably improve the results. The implementation of the energy retrofit scenarios using the calibrated and validated UBEM resulted in a 43 % reduction of the energy use in residential buildings renovated based on the Passive House standard. If this was combined with the generation of on-site solar energy, except for the densely populated areas of the city, it was possible to reach near zero (and in some cases positive) energy districts. The results of grid simulation and power flow analysis for a chosen low-voltage distribution network indicated that energy retrofitting of buildings could lead to an increase in voltage by a maximum of 7 %. This particularly suggests that there is a possibility of occasional overvoltages when the generation and use of electricity are not in perfect balance.

The urban building stock dataset consists of synthetic input and output data for the energy simulation of one million buildings. The dataset consists of four different residential types, namely: terraced, detached, semi-detached, and bungalow. Constructing this buildings dataset requires conversion, categorization, extraction, and analytical processes. The dataset (in .csv) format comprises 19 input parameters, including advanced features such as HVAC system parameters, building fabric (walls, roofs, floors, door, and windows) U-values, and renewable system parameters. The primary output parameter in the dataset is Energy Use Intensity (EUI in kWh/(m2*year)), along with Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) labels categorized on an A to G rating scale. Additionally, the dataset contains end-use demand output parameters for heating and lighting, which are crucial output parameters. jEPlus, a parametric tool, is coupled with EnergyPlus and DesignBuilder templates to facilitate physics-based parametric simulations for generating the dataset. The dataset can be a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers seeking to enhance sustainability and efficiency in urban building environments. Furthermore, dataset holds immense potential for future research in the field of building energy analysis and modeling.

Abstract In view of the relatively large energy consumption of national building stocks, many cities and municipalities start to prepare energetic building stock models to monitor energy efficiency and plan policies at city or regional scales. In many cases, data on individual buildings is not available. A usual approach to this is the “archetype” approach – classifying the building stock into energetic types (archetypes). This classification is usually based on non-energetic properties available in digital cadastres (construction type, year of construction etc.) and can be a large source of error. We present our research into the difficulties and pitfalls associated with such an approach using the city of Hamburg as an example. In the end, we compare the modelled estimates with consumption data at three different levels to evaluate model performance.

Regulations corroborate the importance of retrofitting existing building stocks or constructing new energy efficient district. There is, thus, a need for modeling tools to evaluate energy scenarios to better manage and design cities, and numerous methodologies and tools have been developed. Among them, Urban Building Energy Modeling (UBEM) tools allow the energy simulation of buildings at large scales. Choosing an appropriate UBEM tool, balancing the level of complexity, accuracy, usability, and computing needs, remains a challenge for users. The review focuses on the main bottom-up physics-based UBEM tools, comparing them from a user-oriented perspective. Five categories are used: (i) the required inputs, (ii) the reported outputs, (iii) the exploited workflow, (iv) the applicability of each tool, and (v) the potential users. Moreover, a critical discussion is proposed focusing on interests and trends in research and development. The results highlighted major differences between UBEM tools that must be considered to choose the proper one for an application. Barriers of adoption of UBEM tools include the needs of a standardized ontology, a common three dimensional city model, a standard procedure to collect data, and a standard set of test cases. This feeds into future development of UBEM tools to support cities' sustainability goals. Comment: 30 pages, 3 Figures, 4 tables